<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tatia Pilieva&#8217;s First Kiss: Romanticism versus Cynicism</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/03/20/tatia-pilievas-first-kiss-romanticism-versus-cynicism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindthechintzcurtain.com/2014/03/20/tatia-pilievas-first-kiss-romanticism-versus-cynicism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tatia-pilievas-first-kiss-romanticism-versus-cynicism</link>
	<description>Erotic writing, toys, and a little bit of kink. Come and find out what we’re doing behind the drapes ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Belle</title>
		<link>https://behindthechintzcurtain.com/2014/03/20/tatia-pilievas-first-kiss-romanticism-versus-cynicism/#comment-51633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Belle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 01:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindthechintzcurtain.com/?p=6670#comment-51633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. The commercial component of the film is virtually invisible. I don&#039;t look at the clothes, I look at the faces. I concentrate on the awkward giggling, the tentative touches, the final dive into intimacy with a stranger. None of it relates to WREN and if you hadn&#039;t pointed it out I would never have known. At best it might make some observant people ask &#039;what&#039;s WREN?&#039; if they look at the titles, but other than that, the execution of the idea is delightful. And appeals to the hopeless romantic in us all.
Thanks for sharing Jane. x]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. The commercial component of the film is virtually invisible. I don&#8217;t look at the clothes, I look at the faces. I concentrate on the awkward giggling, the tentative touches, the final dive into intimacy with a stranger. None of it relates to WREN and if you hadn&#8217;t pointed it out I would never have known. At best it might make some observant people ask &#8216;what&#8217;s WREN?&#8217; if they look at the titles, but other than that, the execution of the idea is delightful. And appeals to the hopeless romantic in us all.<br />
Thanks for sharing Jane. x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
